You are viewing a read-only archive of the site that used to be symbii.com, which was active from 2005–2013
Bogey Central Easter Egg
niraj.com
A Niraj
Sanghvi
Website


Something You Might Be Interested In
A collection of funny, interesting, and crazy stories you might be interested in
   

It's been a trend for a while now - people ditching their home phone landlines in favor of using their cellphone all the time. As plans got cheaper and included more minutes, it became even more possible to do so, and the cost of a landline started looking like an unnecessary expense. Some were forced to keep in in order to get cheaper internet via DSL rather than cable, but in acquiring BellSouth AT&T agreed to start offering "naked" DSL...that is, DSL without required landline service. That offer can be found here.

I think the news from the last couple of days will help to increase this trend...first Verizon and then AT&T announced unlimited calling plans, both for $99/month.

The announcements were kind of a surprise (AT&T made their announcement just 5 hours after Verizon's), especially since the rumor was that Sprint would be the first to make a move to an all-unlimited plan:
There had been speculation that Sprint would introduce a nationwide unlimited plan. In May, it introduced one to residents of Philadelphia, Minneapolis, Tampa, Fla., and parts of Northern California and Western Nevada. Sprint's plan costs $119.99 a month, and includes unlimited Web use, e-mail and messaging, which Verizon Wireless' and AT&T's plans do not.

Citigroup analyst Michael Rollins said Sprint "fumbled at the goal line" and let Verizon Wireless get ahead of it in improving customer perception. He called it a surprising move for Verizon Wireless, which has previously used its image as a quality provider to charge higher rates.

Sprint spokeswoman Emmy Anderson said the company is looking at how well the offer is doing in the trial areas, and hasn't announced any plan to take it nationwide.
$100 a month may seem like a lot, but given how much cell phone plans can cost for a limited number of minutes, combined with the monthly cost of a landline, it's easy to see that this would likely be a better deal.

Update: Now T-Mobile is joining the fray, but they're adding on unlimited messaging, and it's still $99.
Submitted by niraj  |   Click for 2 comments

This rant is the 12th installment of the Rant On... series, which will be featured regularly - by which I mean whenever I feel like ranting. Post any suggestions for future rants in the comments.
This rant is a little different than the rest of the series. Here's some ads that don't make any sense (with my reactions in italics):

See American Gangster as you've never seen it before!
- Considering I haven't seen it yet, you could show me just about anything with a label that says "American Gangster" on it, and that'd be true.

Think pets don't get fleas in the winter time?
- No, I don't think that. In fact, they probably do.
Think again!
- Wait, so they don't? I guess I don't need your product. Oh yeah, I don't have any pets anyways. *changes channel*

From the NetZero TV commercial: All internet providers take you to the same internet, so why pay more to get there?
Hmm, where to begin...I can get to work by bike or buy car in the morning, so why pay more for the car? Oh yeah, BECAUSE IT'S 10 BILLION TIMES FASTER. Seriously, who thought that line was clever? They should be forced to use a 56k modem for life.

Why is it called the greatest car in the world?
- Because you keep calling it that? Because your ad guys are lazy at coming up with taglines? Because your definitions of "greatest," "car" and "world" don't match anyone else's? Because you're being facetious? Because you paid someone to call it that? (Note: Credit goes to dave for coming up with some of these)

The DVD has an additional 30 minutes of unseen footage...
- Wow, they're really willing to take a big gamble on that footage. If it were me I'd make sure I knew what I put on my DVD rather than putting some footage nobody's seen on there. Hell, if nobody's seen it, it may not even be footage from the same movie.


And of course, Mitch Hedberg had a great joke that fits in this post nicely:
I saw a commercial on late night TV...It said, "Forget everything you know about slipcovers." So I did. And it was a load off my mind. Then the commercial tried to sell me slipcovers, and I didn't know what the hell they were.
Submitted by niraj  |   Click for 2 comments
  • Currently 4.0/5 Stars
  Currently 4.0/5 Stars, based on 1 vote

George Clooney, Tom Hanks, Robert De Niro, and Meryl Streep are trying to stop another strike from happening just a few months from now, since the writers' strike finally just ended after 3 months. The Screen Actors Guild (SAG) is going to be renegotiating their contract between actors and studios because it expires June 30. The problem is they're adamant about the same kinds of things as the writers: "[SAG President Alan] Rosenberg and chief negotiator Doug Allen have vowed to take a hard line against the studios, hoping to win the union's members not only improved residuals in new media but also a larger cut of DVD sales."
They're already saying that delaying the talks might be a negotiation tactic, but we already know what that could end up in -- another drawn-out strike. And while TV shows have a few months to build up episodes again, movies aren't quite in the same boat. Production takes much longer and so they can't even start on new movies even though the writers have returned, because now there's the threat of a SAG strike which would halt everything.

So Clooney, Hanks, DeNiro, and Streep took out full-page ads in Variety and The Hollywood Reporter urging the SAG leaders to start negotiating now, because everyone's already "strike-weary". After all, without writers, many of the actors have already gone a few months without work too. And I don't think they'd get as much public support either at this point.
Submitted by niraj  |   Be the first to comment!

Yep, it's finally official. 3,775 writers voted tonight, and 92.5% voted to end the strike immediately and accept the proposed contract. As Jon Stewart mentioned on A Daily Show tonight, that means the return of The Daily Show tomorrow night! And he's got two weeks to prep for hosting the Oscars :)
The writers' strike is over!

As I mentioned previously, TV Guide is listing when shows will be returning with new episodes, conveniently also included (now in its entirety) below:


Major bummer if we get no 24 until next January after the monster teaser we've already been sitting on for months!
Submitted by niraj  |   Be the first to comment!

Here it comes...an ABC news article nailed this story yesterday, calling out what was wrong with it and providing some common sense information. But today the story's picked up like wildfire and the sensationalist headlines have got all the news sources all caught up. The story is that artificial sweetners have been linked to weight gain (aka. diet soda may cause weight gain). But it's stupid on numerous counts, as pointed out by ABC:
Don't kill yourself. You may have heard of a recent study indicating that rats gained weight when they ate yogurt sweetened with saccharine but not when it was sweetened with glucose. The result sort of flies in the face of why you were eating sugar substitutes in the first place - to help you lose weight.

Relax. There may be less to this story than meets the eye, indicating exactly why you don't make changes based on a single study.

This study has its share of weaknesses, such as studying a very small number of rats - as few as eight in some of the groups. It also uses saccharine, instead of a sugar substitute with a taste closer to that of sugar. There are a number of other flaws as well - enough to prevent drawing real conclusions from the results.

What's more, these results contrast with other studies showing that rats do compensate for calories pretty well when there is no perceptible taste difference.

Now, one could argue that such is the problem with sugar substitutes: they lure you into a false sense of caloric security. Wrong. The burden of weight management was never supposed to be dumped on the back of a sugar substitute. It takes effort, and we need to come to grips with that.

Sugar substitutes can be one step on the pathway to a healthier weight, but if it's the only step, you won't reach your goal. Of course, sugar substitutes are not a required tool of the job, just an option. Keep to drinking plain water or seltzer and you're fine, too.
Submitted by niraj  |   Be the first to comment!

The post office is raising postage rates again. Oh, the humanity! Wait, they're only raising it one cent? That sounds kind of stupid...why not just wait a little longer and raise it something like 5 cents all at once, so we don't have lots of little transitions?" Could it be because they want to sell lots of those 1 and 2 cent stamps?


Well, the joke's on you USPS! You started offering the
forever stamp which costs as much as today's first-class stamp (41 cents), but will continue to work for first-class mail even as rates increase! So why would I bother getting any 41-cent stamps at all? In fact, I'll even be like this guy and buy $8000 worth of forever stamps so every time you raise postage rates I benefit because I got the stamps for less!
Should we all be stocking up [on forever stamps]?

Absolutely not. Since 1971, postal rates have increased more slowly than the actual inflation rate, as measured by the U.S. Consumer Price Index. So, despite the numerous rate hikes over the last 36 years, stamps have actually been getting cheaper. The 20-cent stamp from 1981, for instance, would be equivalent to 45 cents in today's dollars-which makes today's rate 10 percent cheaper than it was 26 years ago. Should this historical pattern hold, you'd be paying more for today's forever stamps than you would for any stamp in the future, no matter how high the rate goes.

In fact, this pattern must hold - as a matter of law. In December, President Bush signed the Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act, which ensures that future price increases will be kept below an inflation-based ceiling. In other words, postage hikes will never surpass inflation - and the forever stamp will never become a good investment. Incidentally, the USPS announced the introduction of the forever stamp less than two months after Bush signed the act into law.
It should also be noted that just because your stamp doesn't have the number of cents listed doesn't automatically make it a forever stamp. It has to say "Forever" on it. There's non-denominated stamps (here's a page with pictures of them and how much each is worth) that say "First Class" and come out when they know there will be a rate increase but don't know how much yet. These stamps will not be enough when the rate goes up.
Submitted by niraj  |   Be the first to comment!

The interview was pretty funny and you knew there wasn't enough time for them to have a reasonable argument about the innate nature of people and good vs. evil. And it was particularly amusing knowing that Colbert actually teaches Sunday school, which added a whole subtext to the discussion. Still, Colbert's response is priceless. You really only need to watch the last 30 seconds of this.

Submitted by niraj  |   Be the first to comment!

And it likely will end tomorrow night (though some news outlets are erroneously reporting it's already over...writers can still nix this deal), as the WGA has recommended that the latest contract offered by the AMPTP be approved by the members. However, until the members vote to pass it, the strike isn't officially over. That vote will take place tomorrow, and the WGA will announce the results tomorrow night.


After something like 3 1/2 months on strike, it'll be nice to get some good TV on again. Of course there will probably be some delay before we start getting new content, but TV Guide has a rundown of when you can expect your favorite shows to return to air.

They're updating that list as they get more information, but here's some of my favorites:
24
Expected to return this fall or January '09.

30 Rock
Expected to shoot 5 to 10 new episodes to air in April/May.

The Office
Expected to shoot 5 to 10 new episodes to air in April/May.

(No word yet on
It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia or Entourage)
The vote, if passed, will cause an immediate end to the strike, meaning writers could even return as soon as late Tuesday night.

Full details on the deal:
The main advance for the writers comes in the area of residual payments for material broadcast over the Internet and other digital media. As the market for network TV reruns ebbs, industry players expect Web streaming to start spitting out cash in coming years. The writers were especially sensitive about this issue because they believe they were shafted out of millions of dollars in DVD revenue as a result of home-video deals made during the 1980s.

The DGA agreed to a flat fee for material used on the Web, but the writers, in the third year of their contract, will get something far better: a percentage of the distributor's gross receipts. Why does this matter? First, it's proportional. On the off chance that Web streaming does explode into a commercial leviathan, writers will reap the benefits, as opposed to collecting a fee that could wind up looking like a consolation prize. And more important, writers will be paid off the gross that's actually connected to a retailer's price -- say, the $1.99 iTunes charges for a TV episode -- as opposed to the less-impressive "producer's gross," which entails complicated formulas that require a platoon of accountants to unpack.

Now, all of this does not mean that the tentative agreement is nirvana for Hollywood's scribe tribe. Some guild dissenters are already attacking a provision that says the studios don't have to pay any residual on streamed content for up to 24 days after its initial airing. This term exists because the studios don't want to have to fork over cash every time a DVR user queues up a show a week or two after its original airdate. But critics say it gives the studio bosses a significant loophole to exploit.

Nor does the deal extend to jurisdiction over reality and animation writers, which Patric Verrone, president of the guild's West Coast branch, had promised members would be in the next contract. Many in the guild say officials merely used the issue as a stalking horse for the much more vital area of new-media residuals.
Submitted by niraj  |   Click for 2 comments

The Knight Rider TV movie/pilot is going to air on NBC on February 17th, but Will Arnett won't be voicing KITT as originally announced. It turns out that since Will Arnett did voiceovers for some GMC trucks commercials, they were not too pleased with him creating a conflict of interest by voicing a competitor's (Ford's) vehicle. So now the Mustang is going to be voiced by Val Kilmer despite the fact that they had finished all work with Arnett. Though the announcement just became public, it's likely Kilmer was brought in a while ago.

I believe this is an accurate representation about how it all went down:


In case you're curious, here's one of the GMC truck commercials Arnett voiced:

Good thing I just recently created the Super Lame topic, it's highly appropriate for this story.
Submitted by niraj  |   Be the first to comment!

I've been a fan of Google News for some time now...it automatically aggregates stories from thousands of news sources and then determines which stories are the most breaking, what topic they fall under, etc. It was also nice how each story would list multiple sources, so you could read articles with different viewpoints/biases on the same issue.

Yesterday, Ask.com launched a site called Big News. I haven't played around with it that much yet, but while it has many features like those in Google News, it's definitely got some noticeable differences from existing news aggregators that make it worth exploring some more.


For one, all the stories are assigned a "Big Factor" which uses 4 different aspects to rate each story:
What is the Big Factor Average?
Breaking
This factor accounts for the timeliness and freshness of a story, giving more weight to breaking news.
Impact
This factor tracks a story's impact across the Web, monitoring mentions in articles, multimedia and blogs.
Media
This factor identifies the number of quality images and videos associated with stories, providing rich insight.
Discussion
In a sense, the Web is like one big water cooler. This factor weighs the level of those discussions and which ones are making the most noise.


Here's a breakdown of the parts of the summary (non-relevant parts have been darkened by me):

You can quickly scan the Big Factors for stories, as well as mouseover to get the breakdown of those 4 categories. There's also a "Track" button here that will let you track the story via RSS or add it to MyNews if you're logged into Ask so you can view it there. This way you can keep up with new developments on the story.


Each story also mentions the number of articles, blogs, images, and videos that are associated with the story.


But the most distinguishing feature can be seen when you click on either of the arrow icons:


When you follow that link, you get taken to the "Big Picture" for that story. It's here that you get a better breakdown of the sources, and also a timeline of events. For instance, this story on Israel has a 27-day history, and by using the timeline bars at the top you can get sources from each day and see how an event developed:

The Big Picture page with timeline on top - I'm not certain if this page will exist permanently.
So overall I think I like it more in that it's more visual rather than being text-heavy. There's also lots of nifty little things, like mousing over the video links on the main page will play the video without having to go to the source (AP, ESPN, CBS News, etc.) page to view it. In fact right now there's a story with ESPN video that links to a FOX News article...it's interesting that they've managed to integrate the video playing right into the main page since I doubt all the source videos are the same format (Flash, aspx, etc.)...I wonder if they made deals with certain websites that have video.

They also hint at some interesting existing and upcoming filtering/personalization functionality:
How can I find my favorite paper or website's news?
Given the large number of factors involved, your hometown paper or favorite may not appear as a source when browsing the site. However, it is likely considered in the overall importance of a story, as there are more than 10,000 sources that factor into our backend algorithms and computations. Check out our Perspective Filters to find sources in specific categories such as "European News" or "Asia News." Future releases will introduce even more great personalization features.
I'll see if I remember to update this in a week or two after having had some more time to use it and compare it further, but my initial impression is I like it quite a bit and wonder if I'll start using it as a replacement for Google News.
Submitted by niraj  |   Be the first to comment!