You are viewing a read-only archive of the site that used to be symbii.com, which was active from 2005–2013
Bogey Central Easter Egg
niraj.com
A Niraj
Sanghvi
Website


Something You Might Be Interested In
A collection of funny, interesting, and crazy stories you might be interested in
   
Palin followup Politics
I hate to keep harping on this, particularly because I usually don't enjoy political discussions, particularly in the internet medium. For the most part people that have certain views tend to keep those views and see others' views as irrational, and that really applies to everyone. And for those that enjoy that kind of thing, there's enough forums on the internet already.

However, I can't help but notice that the whole Palin situation has been surreal/unnatural. The press are getting no access to her (they're finally starting to make a lot of noise about it), she's not giving interviews, etc. We're nearing a month before the election and the McCain campaign is trying to cancel (or at least postpone) the VP debate. Isn't anyone, and I particularly mean Republicans who are willing to vote her into office, interested in knowing her opinions and thoughts on actual issues? We've gotten nothing but smokescreens and distractions about her family, scandal, etc. but she could just waltz into the White House without anyone really knowing how she'd handle political situations.

We don't have much to go on, but I found her interview with Katie Couric pretty revealing, since she actually got asked some difficult questions. The thing is, these questions shouldn't have been unexpected, and she still floundered. Note that the second half of the second video includes some of the footage from Part I again, even though it is marked Part II.





Let's see...everyone, not just the US, but "The World" is looking to McCain to see how he fixes the economy. Right, I believe that. Because he'll walk into Washington and flip a switch only he has the strength to flip and will save the world while everyone else debates bailout proposals. Per Palin, Barack has no track record in comparison to John McCain on the economy. The same McCain who has admitted to not understanding the economy, who has made several incorrect remarks about the economy in just the past week (not just the fundamentals quote he tried to argue was a misunderstanding), and this coming from Sarah Palin's extensive knowledge of Obama's track record (which she proved last week is non-existent with her "federal transparency" comment). Actually, I should be more understanding...she probably meant Obama has no track record in Alaska since that seems to be all she's aware of.

The best part was when Couric asked if Plain was supporting a moratorium on foreclosures to help homeowners. She clearly didn't know the answer and started saying they were working on a multi-faceted solution. No. Fucking. Shit. You mean, you can't just fix this whole multi-billion dollar mess with a single strategy? Brilliant! But Katie Couric wasn't distracted and pressed for her actual view on the moratorium, at which point Palin was forced to admit she didn't know. Likewise during other questions she started bringing up healthcare and other issues instead of addressing the question. Is it any wonder they're trying to postpone the VP debate?

I guess the good thing that came out of this for Palin was that they didn't bring up sexism, which has already been used to try and discredit findings against her that aren't sexist in the slightest. Really the most sexist comment made towards Palin came from the new president of Pakistan!

Submitted by niraj  |  3 comments

More Stories

To reply to a specific comment, find it below.
  • [Untitled]
    Posted by: junosand on Sep 25th, 2008 | 3:06pm

    it's funny, swap "she" with "he" and "palin" with "obama", and the first part still makes complete sense.

    i don't expect obama, mccain, biden, or palin to have the answer to this economic thing. how about we let economics experts handle this?

    • [Untitled]
      Posted by: niraj on Sep 25th, 2008 | 3:32pm

      I don't expect anyone has all the answers. But I do expect them to have some answers, and also talk about a rational approach to finding the rest. Suddenly deciding the economy is important when you have not been acting that way in several months, and also after letting the situation linger for two days isn't rational. There's a reason McCain's poll numbers have mirrored the economy in recent weeks.

      What first part are you talking about making the word substitution? If you're talking about my first section before the videos, I disagree. We've discussed before that you can't tell how someone's going to act no matter how many speeches they give. But it's all you have to go on and there has to be some faith that the person will stick to their overall message or there isn't a point in voting for anyone at all because anyone could completely lie the whole way through. The point is Palin hasn't given anyone anything to go on. Since being pronounced VP candidate, she's given 2 interviews to Biden's 80 interviews. I can't find a number for Obama or McCain, but I'm sure Obama's had at least as many interviews as Biden (I don't have an exact number but you can't argue there's been at least dozens of interviews).

      Point being, we don't have anything to go on with Palin, and this isn't the case with any of the other candidates. They've all mentioned the policies they're interested in, specific changes they'd make, and how they'd pay for them. (McCain's been more vague on specific policies, but he's at least declared some) All Palin's pushed is "reform" (she always denies the opportunity to define this), everything energy that could benefit Alaska, and now some vague blurb about healthcare.

      That's precisely why I found this interview so interesting. For any question of serious importance, she started talking about other issues because she just doesn't know. Case in point, the last minute of the first video:

      COURIC: I'm just going to ask you one more time, not to belabor the point. Specific examples in his 26 years of pushing for more regulation?

      PALIN: I'll try to find you some, and I'll bring them to ya.



      You may argue that Obama is as unknowledgeable as Palin, but the overall point is he's been questioned in the public eye and people can see for themselves and make a decision. The same can't be said for Palin.

  • Palin
    Posted by: Anonymous on Sep 30th, 2008 | 10:35am

    The woman is IGNORANT. Ignorant is not a bad word, she simply don't know.