You are viewing a read-only archive of the site that used to be symbii.com, which was active from 2005–2013
Bogey Central Easter Egg
niraj.com
A Niraj
Sanghvi
Website


Something You Might Be Interested In
A collection of funny, interesting, and crazy stories you might be interested in
   
Stupid lawyer sues restaurant for "junk faxes" Dumbass
There's a law that was created a while back when companies would spam fax numbers with advertisements, causing annoyance, tying up the fax machine, and wasting toner. The law put harsh penalties on the practice - up to $1,500 per page received. Now, a lawyer is suing a sandwich shop manager for sending him such faxes:
A sandwich shop manager contends he was only trying to clear some old customers out of his fax machine's speed dial when he accidentally started sending his daily menu specials to a Tampa law office.

"I got tired of getting junk faxes," Tampa criminal lawyer William "Casey" Ebsary said Friday. "I was being inundated with faxes from all types of businesses." So this year, Ebsary said, he contacted a lawyer with expertise in a law that makes it illegal to fax business advertisements to anyone who is not a customer or has not given written permission to do so.

Thomas filed a lawsuit on behalf of Ebsary in February against the Twins Luncheon restaurant in Oldsmar. The lawsuit seeks between $5,000 and $15,000 in compensation for 34 unsolicited faxes sent to Ebsary's office, some after Twins Luncheon was notified by certified mail that the practice was illegal, according to court records. "They were on notice to stop doing it, and they kept doing it," Thomas said.

Ebsary could have asked for up to $51,000 in actual and punitive damages, but "he doesn't want to kill the guy, he doesn't want to own the restaurant," Thomas said. "Just give him reasonable compensation for what you've done."
Ok, so it seems like a pretty reasonable case so far. The guy's getting junk faxes and the person sending them ignored warnings to stop. But you know I wouldn't be posting about this if it were that simple:
Twins Luncheon manager Mike Palazzolo, and the owner, his uncle, Ron Palazzolo, said the $7,500 figure they were offered to settle the matter is anything but reasonable. Mike Palazzolo said he routinely faxes his daily special to regular customers. When a couple of them asked to be taken off his mailing list this year, the manager said he was unable to remove the numbers from his fax machine's speed dialer and instead entered a long series of identical digits in their place. He assumed those numbers would be meaningless, but they turned out to be Ebsary's fax number.

When Thomas sent the registered letter Feb. 16 warning of the impending lawsuit, Mike Palazzolo said he immediately called Thomas' law office to ask what number he should remove from the speed dialer. The number Palazzolo said he was given did not match anything on his machine. He said he finally figured out which number was Ebsary's about the time the lawsuit was filed Feb. 24. Ronald Palazzolo said a simple telephone call with the correct number would have resolved the matter the first day Ebsary received one of his nephew's faxes.

"If they had just given us the right number, we would have taken it off," the elder Palazzolo said. "Why do they have to make such a big production out of it? We are a small business. I was going to give them $3,000 out of my pocket just to get the guy off my back," he said. "I understand the law and I think it's a good law, but it was inadvertent ... He's the one that's taking advantage of us."
So the lawyer told the manager to stop faxing him, but couldn't even provide his number? And what kind of stupid fax machine doesn't let you remove numbers from its autodialer? Hell, for the price of the lawsuit the manager could have unplugged the current machine and bought a new one that wasn't a total piece of crap.

Submitted by niraj  |  8 comments

More Stories

To reply to a specific comment, find it below.
  • Lawyers...
    Posted by: Anonymous on May 24th, 2006 | 10:28am

    Do they know any other way than to just sue, sue, sue...
    I'd love to get this extortionist's fax number.
    Here's a guy who makes a living putting drunk drivers back on the road trying to shake down a sanwich shop owner? If you've ever run a restraunt you'd realize that a judgement like the one he's seeking is nothing short of a blow right to the kneecaps.

  • [Untitled]
    Posted by: niraj on May 24th, 2006 | 11:06am

    Anonymous, I agree completely...as you can tell by the title of this story :)

  • You people just don't get it
    Posted by: Anonymous on May 25th, 2006 | 10:21am

    That fax law requires that you KNOW the person you are sending the fax to...BEFORE you send advertising faxes.. it does not matter what the attorney's number was.... they should not have sent the faxes in the first place becasue they did not know who they were sending them to-- That is fax blasting! The sender must have a relationship with the lawyer (not his fax number) before even sending the first fax-- the retaurant did not know the attorney, did not have permission- were told to stop and didn't. They sent faxes 34 times hello anyone home. Dont you think the sender of the fax should know who they are sending them to before they send them? The duty is not on the person being violated by the fax blaster- the duty is on the fax blaster sending them to make sure they are lawful- in advance. Get it right people.

  • Re: You people don't get it
    Posted by: niraj on May 25th, 2006 | 10:32am

    To the second anonymous comment, I'm guessing you didn't read through to the end of my post, where I said the manager was also stupid for not just unplugging the machine if he didn't know what number to remove. And how could the lawyer not provide the number he wanted removed? The "dumbass" distinction in this story applies to both lawyer and restaurant owner.

  • [Untitled]
    Posted by: Anonymous on May 26th, 2006 | 4:48pm

    Maybe it is you who can't quite read clearly- This is like fighting a one-legged man in an ass kicking contest.. Hello anyone home!! The article did say (and they admitted) that the lawyer provided them with the fax number--- they just used the "excuse" that it did not match.-- sure it didn't! get with it.

  • geez
    Posted by: junosand on May 26th, 2006 | 6:27pm

    anonymous is really stickin' it to ya

  • They're both idiots
    Posted by: niraj on May 26th, 2006 | 6:46pm

    Anonymous, the one I linked said exactly the following: "The number Palazzolo said he was given did not match anything on his machine. He said he finally figured out which number was Ebsary's about the time the lawsuit was filed Feb. 24."

    Yeah, the manager said he got a number. He also said it was bogus. How do you know that's an excuse?

    At any rate, the point that they're both idiots (the lawyer and the restaurant guy) still stands. To your point, the restaurant guy is a bigger idiot.

  • Hey friends..
    Posted by: Anonymous on Feb 17th, 2007 | 3:14am

    Hey guys, there's another English person about, :)
    I'm a new on www.nirajsanghvi.com
    looking forward to speaking to you guys soon