You are viewing a read-only archive of the site that used to be symbii.com, which was active from 2005–2013
Bogey Central Easter Egg
niraj.com
A Niraj
Sanghvi
Website


Something You Might Be Interested In
A collection of funny, interesting, and crazy stories you might be interested in
   
Is BBQ cancerous? Food
According to a Reuters article, a connection has been found between barbecued meat and prostate cancer.
A compound formed when meat is charred at high temperatures -- as in barbecue -- encourages the growth of prostate cancer in rats, researchers reported on Sunday. Their study, presented at a meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research, may help explain the link between eating meat and a higher risk of prostate cancer. It also fits in with other studies suggesting that cooking meat until it chars might cause cancer.

The compound, called PhIP, is formed when meat is cooked at very high temperatures, Dr. Angelo De Marzo and colleagues at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore reported. It appears to both initiate and promote the growth of prostate cancer in rats, they said.

"We stumbled across a new potential interaction between ingestion of cooked meat in the diet and cancer in the rat," De Marzo said in a statement. "For humans, the biggest problem is that it's extremely difficult to tell how much PhIP you've ingested, since different amounts are formed depending on cooking conditions."

For the study, Yatsutomo Nakai and other members of De Marzo's team mixed PhIP into food given to rats for up to eight weeks, then studied the animals' prostates, intestines and spleens. They found genetic mutations in all the organs after four weeks.
The study seems somewhat sketchy because they didn't feed the rats charred or barbecued meat, but instead mixed the PhIP substance into other food. Also, rats aren't people.

Submitted by niraj  |  3 comments

More Stories

To reply to a specific comment, find it below.
  • [Untitled]
    Posted by: dave on Apr 4th, 2006 | 10:36am

    If I can live 50 years with barbecue, or 60 without, I'll chose 50.

  • [Untitled]
    Posted by: Anonymous on Apr 4th, 2006 | 11:27am

    what's the point of those ten extra years without barbecue? that's just nonsense

  • [Untitled]
    Posted by: dave on Apr 4th, 2006 | 1:24pm

    I guess you're agreeing with me, anonymous. um.. thanks? i guess?